A Common Sense Approach to the Global Muslim Invasion
Invasion….breaking down of order
No view encompasses all belief,
therefore no belief can encompass reality,
only one’s perception of it is proffered,
fraught with biases, delusions
and experienced taught conclusions,
that in no way can ever represent definitively,
any approximation of truth.
Therefore what right has anyone,
to determine the fate of others due to their belief,
or force a belief structure on anyone,
whether it be religious, political or philosophical,
thinking in any way that belief is better than anyone else’s,
and should be given right of passage
to determine anyone’s fate, whether cultural, racial or ethnic.
Countries and culture’s have boarders,
for good reasons, for they uphold within those borders,
the religions, cultural beliefs and laws pertaining to that country
and all who live within those borders;
should anyone migrate to any other country, for whatever reason,
it is inferred and expected that they embrace and respect the religions,
the cultures and laws of that country, foregoing their previous beliefs
in order to assimilate with those of that country.
If refugees wish to accept the generosity of a host nation
in times of war or social displacement,
then they have to be prepared to accept assimilation
through the relenting of their religious and cultural expectations
in order to do so, otherwise they disrupt that host country
and cause manifest instability and contention,
and must be returned to their country of origin.
Refugees and asylum seekers must understand,
they have not the same rights of cultural and religious freedoms
they had in their country of origin,
and must abide the religions and cultural standards of their host nation,
in all codes of presentation and behavior, as conformity is expected
and the laws of the land adhered to without question,
otherwise they have no place in that society or nation.
Sharia law has no place in western culture,
and will not be tolerated outside Islamic countries,
and those Muslims who settle in Christian nations,
cannot expect to practice any rituals, dress codes or behaviors
that contradict western culture and prevent assimilation;
they have the freedom to practice their chosen religion as anyone else,
but any aspect that contradicts the new culture cannot be accepted.
Because Islam is an archaic religion that in fundamental view,
still oppresses the roles of women, both physically and emotionally,
and gives men ultimate power over both women and children,
allowing violent behavior at their discretion, from a religious view,
this behavior is against all western belief and law,
and so should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law,
as Sharia law has no validity at all in other than Muslim countries.
Islam, as a religion, should have no legal rights in Christian nations,
the same as we would have no rights other that the Sharia laws in eastern nations,
and any religion that promotes violence of any kind,
is not a religion that belongs in a Christian nation,
so if Muslims want to settle in non-Islamic countries,
they should be prepared to relent on cultural and religious laws
in order to assimilate with that host culture,
otherwise they forego their refugee status.
Refugees and asylum seekers have rights,
but not the right to force their beliefs on their host nation, for any reason,
and if they do not assimilate,
they do not belong and should not be permitted to stay.
Tony DeLorger © 2016
videos on YouTube and book sales on website thoughtsforabeautifulmind.com, Amazon and digitalprintaustralia.com.au/bookstore
- Brutal Night - March 30, 2021
- Like a Breeze Recalls - March 27, 2021
- Torrents - September 5, 2020
What you say, Tony, in this “Common Sense Approach…” is indeed true. However, these refugees that are being encouraged by our President to come to the US have absolutely no common sense in relation to our country’s laws, culture, traditions, beliefs, and it seems they could care less. They are brought in, shipped to different areas of our country and left on their own. As a result, crimes are committed against American citizens and a lot of these refugees are pulled into gangs and terrorist groups (like the BLM). The problem is our government welcoming refugees and illegal aliens in for political reasons, such as getting the right to vote and who will they vote for? The political party that welcomed them and gave them the same rights as US citizens. I greatly fear for the safety and rights of not only my children and grandchildren, but the children of this nation who may very well have to grow up under the control of these refugees and radical Muslims.
My opinion of the majority of refugees and radical Muslims is that their wish is “We want to live in your country and we want you to change the laws and beliefs to what we want.” My opinion of Sharia Law is it does not belong in any country – that is not a religious opinion of mine, rather it is a moral belief.
You have written a very well penned piece, Tony, with the most intelligent of thoughts. I wish there were more people like you in power / politics.
Unfortunately to be in politics these days, you’d have to be a criminal, cause no-one else would last. Sad but true. Glad you appreciated the work. You only have to see what’s happened in Europe to know what’s in store for any country who lets these people in. If the government can’t stand up to Islam, they have no chance, and nor does the country.
Suddenly, Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the EU, John Kerry, the Secretary of State, and Hillary Clinton, the Democrat candidate for President, just to name a few, are all openly condemning national borders and calling for them to be taken down, while they also demand that we allow anyone who wants in to enter freely.
‘Borderless nations’ is an obvious oxymoron because how do we know where one nation begins and the other one ends? A nation with no beginning and no end is not a nation at all!
The EU is actually the birth of a nationless, one world government, and we have to decide whether we want remote and faceless bureaucrats to rule the world or keep our national identities. The UK ‘Brexited’ the EU because they had lost their national identity and were being flooded with Muslim ‘refugees’ to the point that the new Mayor of London is now a Muslim. France is now considering a Frexit!
The Muslim invasion coupled with the invasion of other uneducated, unskilled, and ever-dependent classes is intended to dilute our national identities to the point that we won’t care when our borders disappear, along with our nation.
This is a very important piece,Tony, and with your permission I may want to use it elsewhere with full credit to you of course.
Glad you agree my friend, and I understand the EU to be exactly what you stated, this whole boarder-less concept part of the intended one world government: totalitarianism. People must be aware of this reality, the end game. Use it as you will my friend, it needed to be said and understood. Cheers!